SearchLaw Home
Federal Laws
State Laws
Areas of Law
Directories
Find Lawyers
Reference
Organizations
Law Career
Software
Legal News
Consumer Help
People Search

 
Sponsor:
Uslegalforms.com
Selected Forms
Divorce
Power of Attorney
Bankruptcy
Name Change
Promissory Note
Wills
Contracts
Premarital
Real Estate
Deeds
Landlord-Tenant

Search the Web: Enter Search Terms (i.e. alabama court opinions):  |Add your Site  | Search Help

Legal Authority

Legal Authority consists of primary and secondary sources.  Primary sources include constitutions, statutes and court opinions. Secondary authority includes legal treatises and law review articles.

Federal Law is the highest form of primary authority.  The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States.

The order of legal authority of Courts in the order of precedence is:

U.S. Supreme Court Opinions
Federal Circuit Court Opinions
Federal District Court Opinions
State Supreme Court Opinions
State Appellate Court Opinions
State Lower Courts
When one try's to understand how laws are created and just who has final say or authority, it is sometimes confusing.  For example, if Congress enacts a law is the law the final word. No. Why?  Because congress can only act within it's powers set forth in the U.S. Constitution.  Who decides if congress exceeded it's authority? The U.S. Supreme Court.  Another example:  If the U.S. Supreme Court hears a case and makes a decision that the U.S. Congress does not like, it can enact a law within it's powers that in effect repeals the decision. Therefore, a checks and balances is somewhat in place.

The problem is that the Court and Congress cannot always countercheck each other due to interpretations of the U.S. Constitution by the U.S. Supreme Court.  Abortion is the best example of such an area.

Many times common sense and fairness has no application in the law and there are thousands of examples reflected in decisions of the Courts.  Some are hard to understand, while others can be easily understood, even if you do not agree with the decision. Example: A Defendant charged with murder goes free because the search warrant used to locate the evidence contained an error and the Judge excluded all seized evidence. Why? Because the constitution prohibits unlawful searches and seizures and the Supreme Court has ruled that evidence obtained from an invalid search warrant cannot be used as evidence. 

Two things are certain.  Laws change as people change and people change as laws change.  What was once legal is not legal now and what was once illegal is now legal.  Again, their are many examples.  The most recent example is the public change about tobacco and the resulting laws to limit tobacco use and prohibit it's use in certain places.  Our grandparents would never have dreamed of such laws and our parents cannot believe that their long time habit now prohibits them from enjoying traveling, eating out, going to sporting events or even socializing.

I once heard a person say that he could not wait to retire because he was retiring to a place outside the United States.  When I asked why, he said he had lived all his life, except the last 15 years, in very nice foreign countries and that the US is a nation of laws, laws, laws.  He said the foreign counties laws are made to keep bad people in line, not disrupt the lives of the good people.  It made me think.  Is he correct?  Do we place too much emphasis on laws.  In today's world, do you feel like the Police in your City follow the "Duty to Serve and Protect" standard or are out to get everyone and anyone. Maybe Mayberry is only now a dream.



© 2001 Search Law, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer